Philip Davis
Philip Davis
Stop FollowingPhilip Davis
More on TASR by Philip Davis
COMMENTS STATS
845 Comments
1,411 Likes
Philip Davis
Stop FollowingPhilip Davis
Friday The 13th's Follow-Through Failure Forecast [View article]
TZA is a good choice - one of our disaster hedges along with SCO and EDZ. SCO is already a huge winner for us as we took them at oil $103.50. With TZA, rather than spend now $23.81 for the stock, we like to play a spread. For example, you can pick up the Feb $22/27 bull call spread for $1.50 and sell the $22 puts for $1.35 so you have the $5 spread for net $15 and your worst case is you end up owning them for net $22.15 so a bit of a cushion vs. owning the stock and, depending on your margin - you tie up less cash.
You can make that trade far less directional by using a different offset - something bullish you REALLY want to own if the market gets cheaper. Let's say, for example, you like BTU below $35 - you can sell the BTU Feb $34 puts for $1.45 and now you have net .05 on the $5 spread and if the market falls further, you get paid on the TZA and probably own BTU for net $34.05 but, if the market goes up and your TZA goes worthless on you - it's very unlikely BTU goes down and that makes your insurance play free.
There are many beaten-down stocks like X, CHK, TM, HPQ.. that you can use as bullish offsets to bearish hedges - it makes your insurance a lot cheaper when you play it like this but, of course, it's very important that you actually want to establish a long-term position in the offsetting stock you are selling puts against.
Wild Weekly Wrap Up: Cash Is King [View article]
Thanks, Jim!
Wild Weekly Wrap Up: Cash Is King [View article]
Do we compare this to a situation where the whole town is looting the Best Buy and I have to decide whether to go inside the store and buy a TV for $500 or stand outside and buy the same TV for $50 from one of the looters? Do I have the right to criticize the looters while benefiting from the looting?
Or am I simply taking advantage of an obvious catastrophe like the Baltimore Orioles and simply making sensible bets that they are likely to lose, which I can profit from without "hurting" the team and I do still have the right of any fan to criticize the incompetence or am I not allowed to because I bet against them?
Governments are like that too. Can you criticize Obama while earning a living in America? Can you want the system to change from the inside while still playing by the current system's rule or do you make a more effective statement by refusing to participate and attempting to tear it down from without?
I don't think you have to "agree" with the bulls in order to bet that the bull will run towards red but I certainly see your point but I think it would be a lot more fake to pretend I agreed with bullish investors, just because we know how to take advantage of their trading patterns...
Great topic for debate!
Options Trader: Thursday Outlook [View article]
Options Trader: Thursday Outlook [View article]
Applefly $10KP/$25KP - Rolling $155 callers up to $160s for $3 XXX Same for DTP
Options Trader: Thursday Outlook [View article]
NVDA still down but I still like them.
TASR just getting worse and worse. Huge volume, 5x normal day so far with over 10% of the float being dumped this morning. There are 17M shares short at around 10 and they'll cover at $7.50 so this is probably the right spot.
Options Trader: Thursday Outlook [View article]
Are Tuesdays Good for Reversals? [View article]
Cramer - hypocrisy or not the guy is good. He gets that hype machine cranking and drops a few street.com articles around that he then uses to back up what he's saying and it's amazing what he gets done but we make a fortune shorting his crap once they run it up.
Michael - that's a great call you made and I like your work on the blog! Very good stuff.