Energy Metals Corp. (EMU)
Trading Center
Loading...
Symbols:
EMU Forum Topics
- All Comments on EMU
- General Discussion on EMU
- RBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors [view article]
- Uranium Mining In Texas: Energy Metals Corp. [view article]
- Desjardins: Uranium Prices Should Stabilize at $60 [view article]
- Jim Cramer's Mad Money In-Depth Stock Picks, Feb. 22 [view article]
- Panicked Buyers to Drive Molybdenum Price Higher [view article]
- American Uranium Investors Focus on Yellowcake [view article]
- Will Renewable Energy Be Uranium's 'Banana Skin'? [view article]
- Uranium Mania: Watch This Market Grow [view article]
- The Uranium Bull Market Is Far From Over - Two Stocks To Watch [view article]
- Size Really Does Matter: In the Case of Uranium Stocks, Smaller May Be Better [view article]
loading ...Recent EMU Articles
- RBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors
- Desjardins: Uranium Prices Should Stabilize at $60
- Uranium Bull Market Far From Over
- Denison Mines Attempted Takeover of Australia's OmegaCorp Viewed Favorably
- Panicked Buyers to Drive Molybdenum Price Higher
- China’s Battle for African Uranium
- American Uranium Investors Focus on Yellowcake
- Will Renewable Energy Be Uranium's 'Banana Skin'?
- Exploiting Uranium Price Market Inefficiencies
- Uranium Mania: Watch This Market Grow
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
RBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors [view article]
I like this stock: this blog writes goo darticles too:psychologyofthecall.bl.../
Reply
RBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors [view article]
the next president is on CNBC in 30 mins. discussing how the u.s. will be headed in a nuclear direction when he becomes elected.the uranium companies from australia & canada will be getting added positive news with this interview.a final analogy btw. oil & uranium.this is hard to believe but it's true.what it costs China for "1" day of oil @ $120 PER BARREL,that same amout of money would produce enough energy to last China for "a whole year" ; that's right, "1" full year of energy using nuclear.Both China & India will be buying uranium on the open market & the price will rocket for an extended period of time; can you say lower oil prices !!! ReplyRBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors [view article]
National wealth will continue to slide without a cheap source of energy. Oil prices are high because we are not using the cheapest carbon-free energy source we have - Uranium. It's been stalled for 30 years! Fourth generation nuclear reactor technology now burns down the fuel to low radioactive waste that only need 300 years of storage to decay completely. Fuelcells to power cars ultimately need electricity to split the water into hydrogen and oxygen. That's were Nuclear Power comes in. Uranium is simply traded on the NYMEX market. We don't need the Middle East or OPEC or another war here. Thinking about nuclear waste? Check out this article from Engineering newswww.engineeringnews.co...
Regarding RBC and others, I also suspect its just market manipulation and shorting by the big players. Their is demand for the Uranium commodity. See article at www.world-nuclear-news... on "India choked by nuclear fuel shortage" Reply
RBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors [view article]
need to see what the new president said yesterday about nuclear power taking off the the u.s. once he becomes elected !!! ReplyRBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors [view article]
So what. Nuclear power in the US is dead. They say that, even if it was begun today, it would be more than 20 years before an new Nuclear power plant even began startup procedures.The tree huggers and the NIMBY's have made nuclear power an impossibility in this country. Let's just not even talk about it and get on with the development of Wind power, Solar, Cellulose ethanol and fuel cell technology.
This talk of nuclear power is just obscuring what is really important. Reply
RBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors [view article]
It was only couple of weeks ago Goldman sachs was suggesting the spot uranium is only 5% of the market, RBC needs to explain why they choose to follow spot rather then contract prices ??? ReplyRBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors [view article]
That is exactly right 54066 , once they knock prices down ,then they will buy cheap shares of uranium companies to make even more money. ReplyRBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors [view article]
i've noticed over the past few months that it's always RBC making these negative comments about the uranium sector.this is the first article that an analysts has put a name to the story in a long time.seems like to me that RBC is shorting the uranium sector or partical companies as well.you have hard working people out there busting their butts trying to better the company and then these people come along with a nasty agenda trying to knock the value of their company down; where's their morals ??? RBC is just looking out for their own interest and the hell with everybody else !!! ReplyRBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors [view article]
This seems a bit slipshod, or worse disingenuous, on the part of RBC Capital. Less than 10% of the uranium sold goes out on the spot market. Term contracts continue to remain in the $90 range. This is coming from the mouths of Cameco and other uranium miners. If the spot market is such a small component of uranium sales overall, why such a focus on it by the analysts? ReplyRBC Analyst: Low Uranium Prices Could Turn Away Investors [view article]
So, then, what might happen if the U.S. would resume the licensing of domestic nucler reactors? Would this impact the market significantly? ReplyUranium Mining In Texas: Energy Metals Corp. [view article]
The water coming out of the taps and shower heads in our home at Port Lavaca, Texas is radioactive, registering an average of 50 Roentgens per month on dosimeters. One month, a radiation spike of 120 Roentgens was recorded. Before moving here, we lived in Kingsville, Texas, where similar radiation readings were recorded (none as high as 120 Roentgens, however). I'd very much like to hear from anyone about the matter ReplyDesjardins: Uranium Prices Should Stabilize at $60 [view article]
Re: Mr. Coombes comment: " Extreme resource nationalism by the Russians, withholding promised HEU supply to the US." ...The USSR has stated that they intend to increase the cost of their HEU supply considerably. Based on their actions on the petroleum and NatGas fronts, I'd say they intend to do just that. Can anyone say "hardball Comrades!"....
Thx jegan Reply
Energy for
Prosperity
Desjardins: Uranium Prices Should Stabilize at $60 [view article]
The uranium bull market and nuclear renaissance are currently being massively overstated, and the dangers of nuclear power downplayed. From a financial standpoint, there is a case for nuclear power, but it is a long-term case.This article is the antithesis to the near-term nuclear & uranium bulls, continually arguing that there is a "uranium shortage" and expecting a "uranium buying panic".
I pointed out months ago in a similar commentary that even with delays in uranium mining capacity coming online, the expected increase in output is a significant proportion of current production. When pressed on the issue of a shortage, the uranium bulls will fall back with the caveat "mining" shortage -- and this is technically true given that a large portion of US uranium supply is met with Russian HEU. But there is no uranium shortage today.
Nor is there likely to be in the next 5 years. 5 years is the relevant timeframe for two reasons:
1. The Russian HEU agreement officially expires in 2013.
2. Any new plants being constructed from here on out in Asia would not come online before 5 years. (Although the Japanese have done some faster than that, its unrealistic to expect this in the near term.)
As with all energy planning, there is a need to meet near term demand, but an imperative to build supply that can only deliver over a much longer term.
Contrary to the nuclear bull arguments, Gen III and IV reactors are not "proven" to be failsafe, or ever safer. A lot of technological development is in process.
The only near term catalysts would be events extraneous to the core nuclear business:
1. Extreme resource nationalism by the Russians, withholding promised HEU supply to the US.
2. Strategic buying by Chinese and other SWFs to lock up uranium supply.
3. A massive oil shock.
We cannot discount the possibility of any of these. But in any event, the likely outcome of any of these would be more reliance on natural gas (and even coal), while we continue to build out solar and nuclear infrastructure.
Reply
Editors
General Discussion on EMU
Is this a buy or a sell? ReplyHuang
Jim Cramer's Mad Money In-Depth Stock Picks, Feb. 22 [view article]
They are good aricles. I like them.Reply